tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29698602.post2889706595034546550..comments2023-06-10T05:46:17.611-07:00Comments on Del Mar Electronic Anonymous Input Forum: Political Retaliation or Duke Maliciousness, it is in the interests of WHO? Why is a Regent Election So Important NOW?Jaime Kenedeñohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12787459880135027366noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29698602.post-4006740375150814562007-08-03T02:09:00.000-07:002007-08-03T02:09:00.000-07:00Posted by lrlee on August 2, 2007 at 5:02 p.m. (Su...Posted by lrlee on August 2, 2007 at 5:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)<BR/><BR/>kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 - you are a total hipocrit! You judge others so harshly while doing the very thing you claim you hate. Every morning your SPAM emails jam my computer up at work and I can't get my work done for about 5 - 10 minutes until your crap finishes downloading (kinda like you did with this opinion section). When asked to stop emailing the DMC campus you don't even reply or stop. You think you are so justified in raising a stink- but when others don't want to hear your opinion you cram it in their face anyway. YWith your approach - even if what you are saying is true- no one wants to hear it because it's SO obnoxiously done. You need to get the log out of your own eye.<BR/><BR/>Posted by kingalonzoalvarezdepineda13 on August 3, 2007 at 4:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)<BR/><BR/>You are one of the DMC who either want to aquiesce or you side with the problem.<BR/><BR/>The Email accounts at DMC are paid for with public money you should be as lucky that the whole damn district doesn't inundate the email system at Del Mar. The evidence is irrefutable yet you seem to be one of the one yet to thank me as I have received hundreds from your colleges.<BR/><BR/>As far as Hypocrite, I can always use the constructive criticism yet I fail to see the extrapolation you present.<BR/><BR/>It is the public's right to email each and every public email they wish to inform. I have nothing against the practice of free speech and as you know the in house council has not a leg to stand on either so he just blocks the whole system (except his email ) from the public access.<BR/><BR/>It dont matter if you dont want to hear it, you are not only reading it but you are now engaged. That is what I do.<BR/><BR/>If you dont like it click the DELETE button.<BR/><BR/>Now back to the Hypocrite thingy, lets talk about this some more.<BR/><BR/>Spit it out?Kenedeno Mediahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07382788371378179822noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29698602.post-54527854632351588862007-08-02T04:15:00.000-07:002007-08-02T04:15:00.000-07:00Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 141.001(a) (Vernon 2003). (...Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 141.001(a) (Vernon 2003). (2) Section 141.001(a)(5)(B) requires a candidate for regent of the District to reside in the territory from which the office is elected for at least six months before the filing deadline. (3)Jaime Kenedeñohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12787459880135027366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29698602.post-19224343265736635932007-08-02T03:54:00.000-07:002007-08-02T03:54:00.000-07:00(Carlos Valdez) states, "that the District has his...(Carlos Valdez) states, <I>"that the District has historically relied on Election Code section 141.001 as governing the residency requirement for candidates for election to the District's Board of Regents."</I><BR/><BR/><BR/><B>This is simply not true</B> <BR/><BR/>If true, why did the DA request an AG opine?Jaime Kenedeñohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12787459880135027366noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29698602.post-5635050533918389932007-08-02T03:49:00.000-07:002007-08-02T03:49:00.000-07:00§ 141.001. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC OFF...§ 141.001. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC <BR/>OFFICE. (a) To be eligible to be a candidate for, or elected or <BR/>appointed to, a public elective office in this state, a person must:<BR/><BR/>(5) have resided continuously in the state for 12 months and in the territory from which the office is elected for six months immediately preceding the following date:<BR/><BR/>(B) for an **independent candidate, the date of the regular filing deadline for a candidate's application for a place on the ballot;<BR/><BR/>** 2. The term "independent candidate" includes a candidate in a nonpartisan election. See Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 1.005(9) (Vernon 2003).Jaime Kenedeñohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12787459880135027366noreply@blogger.com